On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 09:05:36 -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/16/2011 08:59 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> > virsh didn't call virInitialize(), which (among other things)
> > initializes virLastErr thread local variable. As a result of that, virsh
> > could just segfault in virEventRegisterDefaultI
On 05/16/2011 08:59 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> virsh didn't call virInitialize(), which (among other things)
> initializes virLastErr thread local variable. As a result of that, virsh
> could just segfault in virEventRegisterDefaultImpl() since that is the
> first call that touches (resets) virLast
virsh didn't call virInitialize(), which (among other things)
initializes virLastErr thread local variable. As a result of that, virsh
could just segfault in virEventRegisterDefaultImpl() since that is the
first call that touches (resets) virLastErr.
I have no idea what lucky coincidence made this