On 03/06/2018 12:31 PM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 03/02/2018 04:54 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 02/21/2018 01:11 PM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>>> Before we exec() qemu we have to spawn pr-helper processes for
>>> all managed reservations (well, technically there can only one).
>>
>> "can
On 03/02/2018 04:54 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
> On 02/21/2018 01:11 PM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> Before we exec() qemu we have to spawn pr-helper processes for
>> all managed reservations (well, technically there can only one).
>
> "can be only one"
>
> Since there can only be one why do we
On 02/21/2018 01:11 PM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> Before we exec() qemu we have to spawn pr-helper processes for
> all managed reservations (well, technically there can only one).
"can be only one"
Since there can only be one why do we bother w/ plurality?
> The only caveat there is that we sh
Before we exec() qemu we have to spawn pr-helper processes for
all managed reservations (well, technically there can only one).
The only caveat there is that we should place the process into
the same namespace and cgroup as qemu (so that it shares the same
view of the system). But we can do that on
