Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2 5/5] qemu: Check for thread <=> memory alignment

2016-07-07 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 03:28:44PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 01:43:32PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 01:42:33PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 02:12:32PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > > > > Some sett

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2 5/5] qemu: Check for thread <=> memory alignment

2016-07-07 Thread Martin Kletzander
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 01:43:32PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 01:42:33PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 02:12:32PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > Some settings may be confusing and in case users use numad placement in > combination with

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2 5/5] qemu: Check for thread <=> memory alignment

2016-07-07 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 01:42:33PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 02:12:32PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > > Some settings may be confusing and in case users use numad placement in > > combination with static placement we could warn them as it might not be > > wanted

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2 5/5] qemu: Check for thread <=> memory alignment

2016-07-07 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 02:12:32PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > Some settings may be confusing and in case users use numad placement in > combination with static placement we could warn them as it might not be > wanted (but it's not forbidden). > > Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_b

[libvirt] [PATCH v2 5/5] qemu: Check for thread <=> memory alignment

2016-07-07 Thread Martin Kletzander
Some settings may be confusing and in case users use numad placement in combination with static placement we could warn them as it might not be wanted (but it's not forbidden). Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254402 Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander --- src/qemu/qemu_proce