On Sat, 2017-07-15 at 17:30 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> All the pieces are now in place, so we can finally start
> using isolation groups to achieve our initial goal, which is
> separating hostdevs from emulated PCI devices while keeping
> hostdevs that belong to the same host IOMMU group toge
On Sat, 2017-07-15 at 22:28 -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> > +/* The isolation group for a host device is its IOMMU group,
> > + * increased by one: this is because zero is a valid IOMMU group
> > but
> > + * that's also the default isolation group, which we want to save
> > +
On 07/15/2017 11:30 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> All the pieces are now in place, so we can finally start
> using isolation groups to achieve our initial goal, which is
> separating hostdevs from emulated PCI devices while keeping
> hostdevs that belong to the same host IOMMU group together.
>
> R
All the pieces are now in place, so we can finally start
using isolation groups to achieve our initial goal, which is
separating hostdevs from emulated PCI devices while keeping
hostdevs that belong to the same host IOMMU group together.
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=128054
