On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Prasanna Kalever wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 22:52:01 +0530, Prasanna Kumar Kalever wrote:
>>> Currently, in case if we have 4 extra attached disks, then for each disk
>>> we need to call 'glfs_init' (ov
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 22:52:01 +0530, Prasanna Kumar Kalever wrote:
>> Currently, in case if we have 4 extra attached disks, then for each disk
>> we need to call 'glfs_init' (over network) and friends which could be costly.
>>
>> Additional
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 22:52:01 +0530, Prasanna Kumar Kalever wrote:
> Currently, in case if we have 4 extra attached disks, then for each disk
> we need to call 'glfs_init' (over network) and friends which could be costly.
>
> Additionally snapshot(external) scenario will further complex the sit
Currently, in case if we have 4 extra attached disks, then for each disk
we need to call 'glfs_init' (over network) and friends which could be costly.
Additionally snapshot(external) scenario will further complex the situation.
This patch maintain a cache of glfs objects per volume, hence the
all