Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv4 01/18] blockjob: add qemu capabilities related to block jobs

2012-04-10 Thread Eric Blake
On 04/10/2012 11:24 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >>> As of this[1] qemu email, both commands have been proposed but not yet >>> incorporated into the tree; in fact, the implementation I tested with >>> has changed to match this[2] email that suggested a mandatory >>> 'full':'bool' argument rather

Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv4 01/18] blockjob: add qemu capabilities related to block jobs

2012-04-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 01:17:44PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote: > On 04/09/2012 11:52 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > > The new block copy storage migration sequence requires both the > > 'drive-mirror' action in 'transaction' (present if the 'drive-mirror' > > standalone monitor command also exists) and the

Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv4 01/18] blockjob: add qemu capabilities related to block jobs

2012-04-10 Thread Laine Stump
On 04/09/2012 11:52 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > The new block copy storage migration sequence requires both the > 'drive-mirror' action in 'transaction' (present if the 'drive-mirror' > standalone monitor command also exists) and the 'drive-reopen' monitor > command (it would be nice if that were also

[libvirt] [PATCHv4 01/18] blockjob: add qemu capabilities related to block jobs

2012-04-09 Thread Eric Blake
The new block copy storage migration sequence requires both the 'drive-mirror' action in 'transaction' (present if the 'drive-mirror' standalone monitor command also exists) and the 'drive-reopen' monitor command (it would be nice if that were also part of a 'transaction', but the initial qemu impl