On 11/25/2013 08:39 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 08:20:23PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
>> We support gluster volumes in domain XML, so we also ought to
>> support them as a storage pool. Besides, a future patch will
>> want to take advantage of libgfapi to handle the case
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 08:20:23PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> We support gluster volumes in domain XML, so we also ought to
> support them as a storage pool. Besides, a future patch will
> want to take advantage of libgfapi to handle the case of a
> gluster device holding qcow2 rather than raw sto
We support gluster volumes in domain XML, so we also ought to
support them as a storage pool. Besides, a future patch will
want to take advantage of libgfapi to handle the case of a
gluster device holding qcow2 rather than raw storage, and for
that to work, we need a storage backend that can read
