On 10/27/2012 07:04 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/26/2012 07:07 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
>> On 10/23/12 04:10, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> This is the bare minimum to end a copy job (of course, until a
>>> later patch adds the ability to start a copy job, this patch
>>> doesn't do much in isolation; I've
On 10/26/2012 07:07 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On 10/23/12 04:10, Eric Blake wrote:
>> This is the bare minimum to end a copy job (of course, until a
>> later patch adds the ability to start a copy job, this patch
>> doesn't do much in isolation; I've just split the patches to
>> ease the review).
>
On 10/23/12 04:10, Eric Blake wrote:
This is the bare minimum to end a copy job (of course, until a
later patch adds the ability to start a copy job, this patch
doesn't do much in isolation; I've just split the patches to
ease the review).
This patch intentionally avoids SELinux, lock manager, a
This is the bare minimum to end a copy job (of course, until a
later patch adds the ability to start a copy job, this patch
doesn't do much in isolation; I've just split the patches to
ease the review).
This patch intentionally avoids SELinux, lock manager, and audit
actions. Also, if libvirtd re
