On 10/07/2014 03:16 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 02:06:56PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147639 is an example
>> of a downstream distro's dilemma - when backporting a feature that
>> is implemented in an ABI-compatible manner (n
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 02:06:56PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147639 is an example
> of a downstream distro's dilemma - when backporting a feature that
> is implemented in an ABI-compatible manner (no .so bump was
> required) but where the feature involv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147639 is an example
of a downstream distro's dilemma - when backporting a feature that
is implemented in an ABI-compatible manner (no .so bump was
required) but where the feature involves new bits to be defined
in a flags variable, how does one write co