On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 05:52:11PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-07-20 at 13:49 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > Additionally, this doesn't tell us anything about whether any
> > > host CPU can run a guest CPU: given the above configuration,
> > > on ppc64, we know that CPU 1
On Wed, 2016-07-20 at 13:49 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > IIRC doing something like this was proposed at some point in
> > the past, but was rejected on the ground that existing tools
> > assume that 1) CPUs listed in the NUMA topology are online
> > and 2) you can pin vCPUs to them. So they
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 02:33:33PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 15:35 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 08:48:05PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 01:32 -0500, Shivaprasad G Bhat wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The nodei
On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 15:35 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 08:48:05PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 01:32 -0500, Shivaprasad G Bhat wrote:
> > >
> > > The nodeinfo output was fixed earlier to reflect the actual cpus
> > > available in
>
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 08:48:05PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 01:32 -0500, Shivaprasad G Bhat wrote:
> > The nodeinfo output was fixed earlier to reflect the actual cpus available
> > in
> > KVM mode on PPC64. The earlier fixes covered the aspect of not making a host
>
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 17:52:47 +0200
Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 16:08 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > QEMU fails with errors like
> > >
> > > qemu-kvm: Cannot support more than 8 threads on PPC with KVM
> > > qemu-kvm: Cannot support more than 1 threads on PPC with TCG
>
On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 16:08 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > QEMU fails with errors like
> >
> > qemu-kvm: Cannot support more than 8 threads on PPC with KVM
> > qemu-kvm: Cannot support more than 1 threads on PPC with TCG
> >
> > depending on the guest type.
>
> Note that in a sense the two e
On Tue, 17 May 2016 11:49:22 +0200
Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 17:59 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> > On 05/05/2016 02:48 PM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 01:32 -0500, Shivaprasad G Bhat wrote:
> > >
> > > ** Guest threads limit **
> > >
> > > My dual
On Thu, 2016-05-05 at 20:48 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 01:32 -0500, Shivaprasad G Bhat wrote:
> > The nodeinfo output was fixed earlier to reflect the actual cpus available
> > in
> > KVM mode on PPC64. The earlier fixes covered the aspect of not making a host
> > look
On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 17:59 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> On 05/05/2016 02:48 PM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 01:32 -0500, Shivaprasad G Bhat wrote:
> >
> > ** Guest threads limit **
> >
> > My dual-core laptop will happily run a guest configured with
> >
> >
> >
>
On 05/05/2016 02:48 PM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 01:32 -0500, Shivaprasad G Bhat wrote:
>> The nodeinfo output was fixed earlier to reflect the actual cpus available in
>> KVM mode on PPC64. The earlier fixes covered the aspect of not making a host
>> look overcommitted when
On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 01:32 -0500, Shivaprasad G Bhat wrote:
> The nodeinfo output was fixed earlier to reflect the actual cpus available in
> KVM mode on PPC64. The earlier fixes covered the aspect of not making a host
> look overcommitted when its not. The current fixes are aimed at helping the
>
On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 13:04 +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > So the information don't seem to add up: we claim that the
> > host has 160 online CPUs, but the NUMA topology only contains
> > information about 5 of them per each node, so 20 in total.
> >
> > That's of course because Linux only provide
On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 20:11:41 +0100
Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 01:32 -0500, Shivaprasad G Bhat wrote:
> > The nodeinfo output was fixed earlier to reflect the actual cpus available
> > in
> > KVM mode on PPC64. The earlier fixes covered the aspect of not making a host
> > loo
On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 01:32 -0500, Shivaprasad G Bhat wrote:
> The nodeinfo output was fixed earlier to reflect the actual cpus available in
> KVM mode on PPC64. The earlier fixes covered the aspect of not making a host
> look overcommitted when its not. The current fixes are aimed at helping the
>
The nodeinfo output was fixed earlier to reflect the actual cpus available in
KVM mode on PPC64. The earlier fixes covered the aspect of not making a host
look overcommitted when its not. The current fixes are aimed at helping the
users make better decisions on the kind of guest cpu topology that c
16 matches
Mail list logo
