On 02/10/2011 06:48 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
>> On 02/09/2011 09:02 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
>>> This is done for two reasons:
>>> - we are getting very close to 64 flags which is the maximum we can use
>>> with unsigned long long
>>> - by using LL constants in enum we already violates C99 constr
> On 02/09/2011 09:02 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> > This is done for two reasons:
> > - we are getting very close to 64 flags which is the maximum we can use
> > with unsigned long long
> > - by using LL constants in enum we already violates C99 constraint that
> > enum values have to fit into i
On 02/09/2011 09:02 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> This is done for two reasons:
> - we are getting very close to 64 flags which is the maximum we can use
> with unsigned long long
> - by using LL constants in enum we already violates C99 constraint that
> enum values have to fit into int
Does gcc
