On 04/28/2014 03:38 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 04/04/2014 22:46, Eric Blake ha scritto:
>>> >
>>> > I'm still not seeing what's wrong with depending on the version
>>> > number since other features are also depending on the version
>>> > number.
>> Every feature where we have to guess based on v
Il 04/04/2014 22:46, Eric Blake ha scritto:
>
> I'm still not seeing what's wrong with depending on the version
> number since other features are also depending on the version
> number.
Every feature where we have to guess based on version number is due to a
bug in qemu for not providing enough
On 04/05/2014 04:46 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 04/04/2014 12:29 AM, Michael R. Hines wrote:
Yes, it's present, but it still does not guarantee that QEMU supports
it if RDMA was compiled out - only the version number is a
(minimal) guarantee, and even then the hardware can still throw
an error if R
On 04/04/2014 12:29 AM, Michael R. Hines wrote:
>
> Yes, it's present, but it still does not guarantee that QEMU supports
> it if RDMA was compiled out - only the version number is a
> (minimal) guarantee, and even then the hardware can still throw
> an error if RDMA itself is not supported.
Whic
On 02/04/2014 10:56 PM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 14:28:12 +0800, mrhi...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
From: "Michael R. Hines"
RDMA Live migration requires registering memory with the hardware,
Hmm, I forgot to ask when I was reviewing the previous patch but does
any of this
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 14:28:12 +0800, mrhi...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
> From: "Michael R. Hines"
>
> RDMA Live migration requires registering memory with the hardware,
Hmm, I forgot to ask when I was reviewing the previous patch but does
any of this RDMA migration functionality require speci
From: "Michael R. Hines"
RDMA Live migration requires registering memory with the hardware,
and thus QEMU offers a new 'capability' which supports the ability
to pre-register / mlock() the guest memory in advance for higher
RDMA performance before the migration begins.
This patch exposes this ca