Re: [libvirt] [sandbox PATCH 2/6] We should not turn on the sanbox shell by default.

2013-04-19 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 02:34:51PM -0400, dwa...@redhat.com wrote: > From: Dan Walsh > > We want to limit the number of processes which run within a container, > especially for openshift work loads. Eventually we could add an > option if someone wanted to run this shell. > --- > bin/virt-sandb

[libvirt] [sandbox PATCH 2/6] We should not turn on the sanbox shell by default.

2013-04-18 Thread dwalsh
From: Dan Walsh We want to limit the number of processes which run within a container, especially for openshift work loads. Eventually we could add an option if someone wanted to run this shell. --- bin/virt-sandbox-service | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/bin/virt-sandbox-se

Re: [libvirt] [sandbox PATCH 2/6] We should not turn on the sanbox shell by default.

2013-04-18 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 09:56:57AM -0400, dwa...@redhat.com wrote: > From: Dan Walsh > > We want to limit the number of processes which run within a container, > especially for openshift work loads. Eventually we could add an > option if someone wanted to run this shell. > --- > bin/virt-sandb

[libvirt] [sandbox PATCH 2/6] We should not turn on the sanbox shell by default.

2013-04-18 Thread dwalsh
From: Dan Walsh We want to limit the number of processes which run within a container, especially for openshift work loads. Eventually we could add an option if someone wanted to run this shell. --- bin/virt-sandbox-service | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/bin/virt-sandbox-se