On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 2:37 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 23.08.2016 08:57, Prasanna Kalever wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:10 AM, Michal Privoznik
>> wrote:
>>> On 17.08.2016 11:02, Prasanna Kalever wrote:
[ oops! apologies, my previous draft miss the links ]
Hello,
On 23.08.2016 08:57, Prasanna Kalever wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:10 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> On 17.08.2016 11:02, Prasanna Kalever wrote:
>>> [ oops! apologies, my previous draft miss the links ]
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
> Thanks Michal that really helps.
>
> So If I understand it right,
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:10 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 17.08.2016 11:02, Prasanna Kalever wrote:
>> [ oops! apologies, my previous draft miss the links ]
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> This was the scenario close to 3 years back, libvirt's live migration
>> tries to use ports in ephemeral port range, b
On 17.08.2016 11:02, Prasanna Kalever wrote:
> [ oops! apologies, my previous draft miss the links ]
>
> Hello,
>
> This was the scenario close to 3 years back, libvirt's live migration
> tries to use ports in ephemeral port range, but has no fallback to use
> (an)other port(s) when the one it wa
On 08/22/2016 08:08 AM, Prasanna Kalever wrote:
> Can someone please invest few cycles here ?
>
The bulk of the team is at KVM Forum in Toronto with limited time and
access, so please try to be patient.
John
> Thanks,
> --
> Prasanna
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Prasanna Kalever
Can someone please invest few cycles here ?
Thanks,
--
Prasanna
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Prasanna Kalever wrote:
> [ oops! apologies, my previous draft miss the links ]
>
> Hello,
>
> This was the scenario close to 3 years back, libvirt's live migration
> tries to use ports in ephemeral
[ oops! apologies, my previous draft miss the links ]
Hello,
This was the scenario close to 3 years back, libvirt's live migration
tries to use ports in ephemeral port range, but has no fallback to use
(an)other port(s) when the one it wants is already in use.
If some port say 49152 is already u
Hello,
This was the scenario close to 3 years back, libvirt's live migration
tries to use ports in ephemeral port range, but has no fallback to use
(an)other port(s) when the one it wants is already in use.
If some port say 49152 is already used by some application say gluster
in our case (gluste