On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:39 PM, harryxiyou wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 04/15/2013 09:16 AM, harryxiyou wrote:
I could be if you want, but the question is which project you are focusing
on? This one or the renaming APIs? And as far as I got from t
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 04/15/2013 09:16 AM, harryxiyou wrote:
>>> I could be if you want, but the question is which project you are focusing
>>> on? This one or the renaming APIs? And as far as I got from the wiki page,
>>> we generally don't want the student fail
On 15/04/13 23:28, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
On 15/04/13 23:10, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
On 15/04/13 22:41, harryxiyou wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:43 PM, harryxiyou
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15,
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
[...]
> I asked because it seems like a very mechanical and relatively short
> thing to work on.
>
> If you still think the scope is good, then please add the project idea
> to the GSoC wiki using this template:
> http://qemu-project.org/Goo
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
[...]
> This indeed feels like a reasonable project, where there is enough work
> to do to fill up 12 weeks of good effort while still having something
> measurable to commit, and where the design is known enough in advance
> that it won't be sta
On 04/15/2013 09:16 AM, harryxiyou wrote:
>> I could be if you want, but the question is which project you are focusing
>> on? This one or the renaming APIs? And as far as I got from the wiki page,
>> we generally don't want the student fails, and the renaming APIs work is
>> much simpler than this
On 15/04/13 23:16, harryxiyou wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
On 15/04/13 22:41, harryxiyou wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:43 PM, harryxiyou wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Daniel P. Berrange
wrote:
[...]
I'm not hugely comfortable with the idea of "cap
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
> On 15/04/13 23:10, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
>>>
>>> On 15/04/13 22:41, harryxiyou wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:43 PM, harryxiyou
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013
On 15/04/13 23:28, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
On 15/04/13 23:10, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
On 15/04/13 22:41, harryxiyou wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:43 PM, harryxiyou
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15,
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Daniel P. Berrange
wrote:
[...]
> Enthusiasm of the students to learn libvirt isn't the only consideration.
> The project mentors have to put non-trivial effort into GSoC and want to
> have some level of confidence that the project will result in a positive
> out
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
[...]
> A project must be a 12-week effort. Are you saying you'd like to
> focus on just capability support for 12 weeks?
>
Yup, after i read the comments from Danpb and Osier, i find Renaming all
APIs is more comfortable for GSOC. I have
On 15/04/13 23:10, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
On 15/04/13 22:41, harryxiyou wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:43 PM, harryxiyou wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Daniel P. Berrange
wrote:
[...]
I'm not hugely comfortable with the idea of
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
> On 15/04/13 22:41, harryxiyou wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:43 PM, harryxiyou wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Daniel P. Berrange
>>> wrote:
>>> [...]
I'm not hugely comfortable with the idea of "capability s
On 15/04/13 22:41, harryxiyou wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:43 PM, harryxiyou wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
[...]
I'm not hugely comfortable with the idea of "capability support" being
done by a student. IMHO to do a good job on that design-wise requires
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
> On 15/04/13 22:41, harryxiyou wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:43 PM, harryxiyou wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Daniel P. Berrange
>>> wrote:
>>> [...]
I'm not hugely comfortable with the idea of "capability su
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 09:43:55PM +0800, harryxiyou wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Daniel P. Berrange
> wrote:
> [...]
> > I'm not hugely comfortable with the idea of "capability support" being
> > done by a student. IMHO to do a good job on that design-wise requires
> > someone with
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 4:41 PM, harryxiyou wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:43 PM, harryxiyou wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Daniel P. Berrange
>> wrote:
>> [...]
>>> I'm not hugely comfortable with the idea of "capability support" being
>>> done by a student. IMHO to do a good j
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:43 PM, harryxiyou wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Daniel P. Berrange
> wrote:
> [...]
>> I'm not hugely comfortable with the idea of "capability support" being
>> done by a student. IMHO to do a good job on that design-wise requires
>> someone with a very good
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
[...]
> I'm not hugely comfortable with the idea of "capability support" being
> done by a student. IMHO to do a good job on that design-wise requires
> someone with a very good understanding of libvirt architecture & application
> needs.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:34:01AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 15.04.2013 04:43, harryxiyou wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi
> > wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 08:34:18AM +0200, Michal
On 15/04/13 16:34, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 15.04.2013 04:43, harryxiyou wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 08:34:18AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 10.04.2013 15:13, harry
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:43:22AM +0800, harryxiyou wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
> > wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 08:34:18AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> >>> On 10.04.2013 15:13, harryxiyou w
On 15/04/13 15:56, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 4:43 AM, harryxiyou wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 08:34:18AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 10.04.2013
On 15.04.2013 04:43, harryxiyou wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 08:34:18AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 10.04.2013 15:13, harryxiyou wrote:
>
> Hi all,
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 4:43 AM, harryxiyou wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 08:34:18AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 10.04.2013 15:13, harryxiyou wrote:
>
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 08:34:18AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>>> On 10.04.2013 15:13, harryxiyou wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi all,
>>> >
>>> > I've also got some ideas like fo
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
> On 13/04/13 00:05, harryxiyou wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi
>> wrote:
>> [...]
>>>
>>> Right, I'm trying to check with danpb, mprivozn, eblake, and osier
>>> whether these tasks are worthy of a 12-week project.
On 13/04/13 13:35, Osier Yang wrote:
On 13/04/13 00:05, harryxiyou wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi
wrote:
[...]
Right, I'm trying to check with danpb, mprivozn, eblake, and osier
whether these tasks are worthy of a 12-week project.
There needs to be agreement here be
On 13/04/13 00:05, harryxiyou wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
[...]
Right, I'm trying to check with danpb, mprivozn, eblake, and osier
whether these tasks are worthy of a 12-week project.
There needs to be agreement here before we can add this as a project
idea
On 13/04/13 13:27, Osier Yang wrote:
On 12/04/13 23:57, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:56 PM, harryxiyou
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:47 PM, harryxiyou
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi
wrote:
[...]
Michal said earlier that virsh vol-move seem
On 12/04/13 23:57, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:56 PM, harryxiyou wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:47 PM, harryxiyou wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
[...]
Michal said earlier that virsh vol-move seemed too small a task.
Yes, a new virsh
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
[...]
> Right, I'm trying to check with danpb, mprivozn, eblake, and osier
> whether these tasks are worthy of a 12-week project.
>
> There needs to be agreement here before we can add this as a project
> idea to the GSoC wiki page.
>
Okay,
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:47 PM, harryxiyou wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> [...]
>> Michal said earlier that virsh vol-move seemed too small a task.
>>
>> Do you think that these 4 tasks together merit a 12-week project?
>>
>
> Yes, these 4 tasks should be a
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:56 PM, harryxiyou wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:47 PM, harryxiyou wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> [...]
>>> Michal said earlier that virsh vol-move seemed too small a task.
>>>
>>> Do you think that these 4 tasks together meri
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:47 PM, harryxiyou wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> [...]
>> Michal said earlier that virsh vol-move seemed too small a task.
>>
>> Do you think that these 4 tasks together merit a 12-week project?
>>
>
> Yes, these 4 tasks should be a
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
[...]
> Michal said earlier that virsh vol-move seemed too small a task.
>
> Do you think that these 4 tasks together merit a 12-week project?
>
Yes, these 4 tasks should be a whole project which may merit
almost a 12-week project. Like dan
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 08:34:18AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> On 10.04.2013 15:13, harryxiyou wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I've also got some ideas like following for GSOC 2013.
>> >
>> > Storage driver jobs.
>> >
>> > Curr
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 08:34:18AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 10.04.2013 15:13, harryxiyou wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've also got some ideas like following for GSOC 2013.
> >
> > Storage driver jobs.
> >
> > Currently, there is no Libvirt storage API to rename storage volume,
> >
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
Hi Michal,
> I am not sure we want *rename virsh commands. Not only for storage, but
> in general. And even if we do want these, they don't require a new API.
> They can be implemented with simple vir*GetXML(); vir*Define();
> vir*Undefine
On 12/04/13 14:34, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 10.04.2013 15:13, harryxiyou wrote:
Hi all,
I've also got some ideas like following for GSOC 2013.
Storage driver jobs.
Currently, there is no Libvirt storage API to rename storage volume,
storage pool, snapshot, etc. There is also no Libvirt API
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
Hi Michal,
> I am not sure we want *rename virsh commands. Not only for storage, but
> in general. And even if we do want these, they don't require a new API.
> They can be implemented with simple vir*GetXML(); vir*Define();
> vir*Undefine
On 10.04.2013 15:13, harryxiyou wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've also got some ideas like following for GSOC 2013.
>
> Storage driver jobs.
>
> Currently, there is no Libvirt storage API to rename storage volume,
> storage pool, snapshot, etc. There is also no Libvirt API to move
> volume from one p
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
[...]
>
> Not sure if you planned to request separate projects for these, but I don't
> think it's deserved for separate projects. They can be just one project,
> as the work need to do for them is similar.
Sure, they are a whole project for GSOC
On 12/04/13 13:07, Osier Yang wrote:
On 10/04/13 21:13, harryxiyou wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Michal Privoznik
wrote:
On 07.02.2013 16:19, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
I have created the Google Summer of Code 2013 wiki page where you can
add project ideas:
http://wiki.qemu.org/Google_S
On 10/04/13 21:13, harryxiyou wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 07.02.2013 16:19, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
I have created the Google Summer of Code 2013 wiki page where you can
add project ideas:
http://wiki.qemu.org/Google_Summer_of_Code_2013
Please add project
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 07.02.2013 16:19, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> I have created the Google Summer of Code 2013 wiki page where you can
>> add project ideas:
>>
>> http://wiki.qemu.org/Google_Summer_of_Code_2013
>>
>> Please add project ideas you are willing
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
[...]
> Hi Harry,
Hi Stefan,
> Thanks for your interest. You can begin thinking about ideas but
> please keep in mind that we are still in the very early stages of GSoC
> preparation.
>
> Google will publish the list of accepted organizati
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:39 AM, harryxiyou wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>> I believe Google will announce GSoC again this year (there is
>>> no guarantee though) and I have created the wiki page so w
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> I believe Google will announce GSoC again this year (there is
>> no guarantee though) and I have created the wiki page so we can begin
>> organizing project ideas that students can
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> I believe Google will announce GSoC again this year (there is
> no guarantee though) and I have created the wiki page so we can begin
> organizing project ideas that students can choose from.
Google Summer of Code 2013 has just been announc
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Osier Yang wrote:
> On 2013年02月08日 16:07, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>>
>> On 07.02.2013 16:19, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>>
>>> I have created the Google Summer of Code 2013 wiki page where you can
>>> add project ideas:
>>>
>>> http://wiki.qemu.org/Google_Summer_of_Cod
On 2013年02月08日 16:07, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 07.02.2013 16:19, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
I have created the Google Summer of Code 2013 wiki page where you can
add project ideas:
http://wiki.qemu.org/Google_Summer_of_Code_2013
Please add project ideas you are willing to mentor. If you have an
On 07.02.2013 16:19, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> I have created the Google Summer of Code 2013 wiki page where you can
> add project ideas:
>
> http://wiki.qemu.org/Google_Summer_of_Code_2013
>
> Please add project ideas you are willing to mentor. If you have an
> idea but cannot mentor this year,
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
CCed libvir-list to see if libvirt would like to do a joint
application with QEMU.
As mentioned, it's early days and GSoC 2013 has not been announced
yet. I just want to start gathering ideas and seeing who is willing
to mentor this year.
S
54 matches
Mail list logo
