Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:38:13PM -0500, Matthew Farrellee wrote:
>> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 04:13:38PM -0400, Hugh O. Brock wrote:
Not too long ago we took a patch that allowed QEMU VMs to keep running
even if libvirtd died or wa
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 08:56:18PM +0200, Gerrit Slomma wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrange schrieb:
> >On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:38:13PM -0500, Matthew Farrellee wrote:
> >
> >>It doesn't appear to be the case that the libvirtd daemon can trivially
> >>restart and continue with no interruptions. Right
Hugh O. Brock schrieb:
Not too long ago we took a patch that allowed QEMU VMs to keep running
even if libvirtd died or was restarted.
I was talking to Matt Farellee (cc'd) this afternoon about
manageability, and he feels fairly strongly that this behavior should be
optional -- in other words, it
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:38:13PM -0500, Matthew Farrellee wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 04:13:38PM -0400, Hugh O. Brock wrote:
> >> Not too long ago we took a patch that allowed QEMU VMs to keep running
> >> even if libvirtd died or was restarted.
> >>
> >> I was
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 04:13:38PM -0400, Hugh O. Brock wrote:
>> Not too long ago we took a patch that allowed QEMU VMs to keep running
>> even if libvirtd died or was restarted.
>>
>> I was talking to Matt Farrellee (cc'd) this afternoon about
>> manageability, and he
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 04:13:38PM -0400, Hugh O. Brock wrote:
> Not too long ago we took a patch that allowed QEMU VMs to keep running
> even if libvirtd died or was restarted.
>
> I was talking to Matt Farellee (cc'd) this afternoon about
> manageability, and he feels fairly strongly that this b
Dnia wtorek 05 maj 2009 o 22:13:38 Hugh O. Brock napisał(a):
> Not too long ago we took a patch that allowed QEMU VMs to keep running
> even if libvirtd died or was restarted.
>
> I was talking to Matt Farellee (cc'd) this afternoon about
> manageability, and he feels fairly strongly that this beha
Not too long ago we took a patch that allowed QEMU VMs to keep running
even if libvirtd died or was restarted.
I was talking to Matt Farellee (cc'd) this afternoon about
manageability, and he feels fairly strongly that this behavior should be
optional -- in other words, it should be possible to gu
