On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 02:21:35PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 03:19:11PM +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 01:36:10PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > After Daniel's feedback that adding src/virterror.h is confusing, I've
> > > re-done t
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 03:19:11PM +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 01:36:10PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > After Daniel's feedback that adding src/virterror.h is confusing, I've
> > re-done the patch to instead add virterror_internal.h, making it clear
> > that these
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 01:36:10PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> After Daniel's feedback that adding src/virterror.h is confusing, I've
> re-done the patch to instead add virterror_internal.h, making it clear
> that these function prototypes are related to virterror.c, but internal
> use only.
After Daniel's feedback that adding src/virterror.h is confusing, I've
re-done the patch to instead add virterror_internal.h, making it clear
that these function prototypes are related to virterror.c, but internal
use only. That patch is basically moving them out of src/internal.h
In addition it re
