On 11 Jun 2010, at 06:28, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:52:28AM -0700, Andrew Farmer wrote:
>> Libvirt currently makes the assumption that disk devices are always
>> accessible as files on the local system. However, certain types of virtual
>> storage on qemu (e.g, NBD) m
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:52:28AM -0700, Andrew Farmer wrote:
> Libvirt currently makes the assumption that disk devices are always
> accessible as files on the local system. However, certain types of virtual
> storage on qemu (e.g, NBD) may not be. This patch defines a new "virtual"
> disk dev
On 10 Jun 2010, at 17:22, Justin Clift wrote:
> Haven't taken a look at how NBD devices attach to the host system yet, so I'm
> just trying to understand the concept here.
>
> I'm used to some other network storage types (ie SRP LUNs), that when
> configured on a host system present as a disk de
On 06/11/2010 03:52 AM, Andrew Farmer wrote:
Libvirt currently makes the assumption that disk devices are always
accessible as files on the local system. However, certain types of
virtual storage on qemu (e.g, NBD) may not be. This patch defines a
new "virtual" disk device which is treated simila
Libvirt currently makes the assumption that disk devices are always accessible
as files on the local system. However, certain types of virtual storage on qemu
(e.g, NBD) may not be. This patch defines a new "virtual" disk device which is
treated similarly to existing disk types, but which is exe