Re: [libvirt] RFC: Limited dynamic ownership

2016-08-29 Thread Martin Kletzander
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 07:25:56PM -0400, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 06:17:44PM -0400, Martin Kletzander wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 05:54:29PM -0400, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 05:06:20PM -0400, Martin Kletzander wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > >

Re: [libvirt] RFC: Limited dynamic ownership

2016-08-23 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 06:17:44PM -0400, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 05:54:29PM -0400, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 05:06:20PM -0400, Martin Kletzander wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > so there was an idea about limiting the relabelling of imag

Re: [libvirt] RFC: Limited dynamic ownership

2016-08-23 Thread Martin Kletzander
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 05:54:29PM -0400, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 05:06:20PM -0400, Martin Kletzander wrote: Hi everyone, so there was an idea about limiting the relabelling of images that libvirt does. And I'm taking the liberty of pitching my idea how to approach th

Re: [libvirt] RFC: Limited dynamic ownership

2016-08-23 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 05:06:20PM -0400, Martin Kletzander wrote: > Hi everyone, > > so there was an idea about limiting the relabelling of images that > libvirt does. And I'm taking the liberty of pitching my idea how to > approach this. I feel like it's pretty simple thing and there's not > m

[libvirt] RFC: Limited dynamic ownership

2016-08-23 Thread Martin Kletzander
Hi everyone, so there was an idea about limiting the relabelling of images that libvirt does. And I'm taking the liberty of pitching my idea how to approach this. I feel like it's pretty simple thing and there's not much to talk about, but a) I could've missed something and b) you might hate th