On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:47:21AM -0400, David Lively wrote:
> I'm not crazy about "node driver" either (it has drifted somewhat from
> its original intention, as I understood that many of the "node"
> operations may be hypervisor-dependent).
>
> Ben Guthro suggested "Device Monitor" which seems
I'm not crazy about "node driver" either (it has drifted somewhat from
its original intention, as I understood that many of the "node"
operations may be hypervisor-dependent).
Ben Guthro suggested "Device Monitor" which seems just right to me. I
*think* it's clear that we're monitoring the node'
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 01:49:19PM -0400, David Lively wrote:
> This patch contains the public API additions.
>
the libvirt.h part looks just fine at this point for me.
I'm just wondering a bit about some of the naming "node driver"
are devkit and Hal really "node drivers", then sound more like
This patch contains the public API additions.
diff --git a/include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in b/include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in
index 3624367..c888943 100644
--- a/include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in
+++ b/include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in
@@ -993,6 +993,76 @@ char * virStorageVolGetPath(v
