Re: [libvirt] Re-2: [Patch] Libvirt - Fix locking for readonly devices

2012-05-14 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 08:32:01AM +, David Weber wrote: > > This isn't good - the lock manager implementation must be the > > one to decide what todo with readonly & shared disks. The sanlock > > plugin, however, does not currently support readonly/shared leases > > hence why it rejects them.

[libvirt] Re-2: [Patch] Libvirt - Fix locking for readonly devices

2012-05-14 Thread David Weber
> On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 09:41:02AM +, David Weber wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm currently working on getting sanlock into Debian/Ubuntu. > > While testing, I noticed that I wasn't able to add a readonly > > or shared device: "internal error unsupported > > configuration: Readonly leases are n