On 05/14/2012 03:53 AM, David Weber wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, your patch looks good but needs two further small additions
>> to the libvirt_sanlock.aug and test_libvirt_sanlock.aug files to
>> take account of the new config parameter.
>
> Oops, Updated patch attached (tested with augparse)
>
> David
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 08:32:01AM +, David Weber wrote:
> > > This isn't good - the lock manager implementation must be the
> > > one to decide what todo with readonly & shared disks. The sanlock
> > > plugin, however, does not currently support readonly/shared leases
> > > hence why it reje
