On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:09:42AM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 10:57:17 +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> >Sorry I didn't push an rc2 on Friday, finishing my move, but not seeing
> > any
> > issue raised by rc1, I though it was better to push the final release now
> >
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 10:57:17 +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>Sorry I didn't push an rc2 on Friday, finishing my move, but not seeing any
> issue raised by rc1, I though it was better to push the final release now and
> free
> up the tree for pending development. As a result 2.1.0 is tagged
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 02:46:34PM +0100, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 2 Aug 2016, at 09:57, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > Sorry I didn't push an rc2 on Friday, finishing my move, but not seeing
> > any
> > issue raised by rc1, I though it was better to push the final release now
> > and free
> > up
On 2 Aug 2016, at 09:57, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> Sorry I didn't push an rc2 on Friday, finishing my move, but not seeing any
> issue raised by rc1, I though it was better to push the final release now and
> free
> up the tree for pending development. As a result 2.1.0 is tagged in git and I
>
Sorry I didn't push an rc2 on Friday, finishing my move, but not seeing any
issue raised by rc1, I though it was better to push the final release now and
free
up the tree for pending development. As a result 2.1.0 is tagged in git and I
pushed signed tarbal and rpms to the usual place:
ftp
