On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 05:32:45PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 05:25:12PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 06:19:56PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> after upgrade to gnutls-3.3.0, I discovered (commandtest fails) that
> any
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 05:25:12PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 06:19:56PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > after upgrade to gnutls-3.3.0, I discovered (commandtest fails) that
> > any code linked with -lgnutls will have not 3, but 5 open file
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 06:19:56PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> after upgrade to gnutls-3.3.0, I discovered (commandtest fails) that
> any code linked with -lgnutls will have not 3, but 5 open file
> descriptors upon the entry into main(). I asked on gnutls-help [1] if
> the
Hi everyone,
after upgrade to gnutls-3.3.0, I discovered (commandtest fails) that
any code linked with -lgnutls will have not 3, but 5 open file
descriptors upon the entry into main(). I asked on gnutls-help [1] if
they know they are leaking file descriptors. The response was, that
this is inte