Re: [libvirt] Test failures with newest gnutls

2014-05-01 Thread Martin Kletzander
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 05:32:45PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 05:25:12PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 06:19:56PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > Hi everyone, > > after upgrade to gnutls-3.3.0, I discovered (commandtest fails) that > any

Re: [libvirt] Test failures with newest gnutls

2014-04-29 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 05:25:12PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 06:19:56PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > after upgrade to gnutls-3.3.0, I discovered (commandtest fails) that > > any code linked with -lgnutls will have not 3, but 5 open file

Re: [libvirt] Test failures with newest gnutls

2014-04-29 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 06:19:56PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > Hi everyone, > > after upgrade to gnutls-3.3.0, I discovered (commandtest fails) that > any code linked with -lgnutls will have not 3, but 5 open file > descriptors upon the entry into main(). I asked on gnutls-help [1] if > the

[libvirt] Test failures with newest gnutls

2014-04-29 Thread Martin Kletzander
Hi everyone, after upgrade to gnutls-3.3.0, I discovered (commandtest fails) that any code linked with -lgnutls will have not 3, but 5 open file descriptors upon the entry into main(). I asked on gnutls-help [1] if they know they are leaking file descriptors. The response was, that this is inte