Re: [libvirt] What to do about the qemu "-boot strict" option

2013-11-28 Thread Laine Stump
On 11/28/2013 01:56 AM, Amos Kong wrote: > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 02:37:02PM +0200, Laine Stump wrote: >> Awhile back a bug was filed against libvirt about the inability to completely >> exclude a disk from the boot order: >> >>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888635 >> >> In short,

Re: [libvirt] What to do about the qemu "-boot strict" option

2013-11-27 Thread Amos Kong
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 02:37:02PM +0200, Laine Stump wrote: > Awhile back a bug was filed against libvirt about the inability to completely > exclude a disk from the boot order: > >    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888635 > > In short, you can't have a domain that used PXE to boot,

Re: [libvirt] What to do about the qemu "-boot strict" option

2013-11-27 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 02:37:02PM +0200, Laine Stump wrote: > Awhile back a bug was filed against libvirt about the inability to > completely exclude a disk from the boot order: > >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888635 > > In short, you can't have a domain that used PXE to boot,

Re: [libvirt] What to do about the qemu "-boot strict" option

2013-11-27 Thread Jiri Denemark
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 14:37:02 +0200, Laine Stump wrote: > Awhile back a bug was filed against libvirt about the inability to > completely exclude a disk from the boot order: > >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888635 > > In short, you can't have a domain that used PXE to boot, b

[libvirt] What to do about the qemu "-boot strict" option

2013-11-27 Thread Laine Stump
Awhile back a bug was filed against libvirt about the inability to completely exclude a disk from the boot order: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888635 In short, you can't have a domain that used PXE to boot, but also has an un-bootable disk device *even if that disk isn't listed