: Tavares, John
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com; Tomen Tse; Chen, Jianjiun; Betley, Greg
Subject: Re: [libvirt] libvirt on x64
On 07/26/2010 12:17 PM, Tavares, John wrote:
> I think I finally found such a system running RHEL 5.5 on x64 and it does
> have both a 32-bit and 64-bit version of libvirt ins
On 07/26/2010 12:17 PM, Tavares, John wrote:
> I think I finally found such a system running RHEL 5.5 on x64 and it does
> have both a 32-bit and 64-bit version of libvirt installed (0.6.3). Maybe
> this is just a SLES issue??
By default, 64-bit RHEL does not ship 32-bit versions of a library
u
ibvir-list@redhat.com; Tomen Tse; Chen, Jianjiun; Betley, Greg
Subject: RE: [libvirt] libvirt on x64
Hi Eric,
Thanks for getting back to me. This may have been a system running SLES 10.2
(2.6.16.60-0.21-xen (SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 (x86_64))).
As to RHEL 5.5, it seems to come with 0.6.3
think that both should be installed by default.
Thanks.
John
-Original Message-
From: Eric Blake [mailto:ebl...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 1:37 PM
To: Tavares, John
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com; Tomen Tse; Chen, Jianjiun; Betley, Greg
Subject: Re: [libvirt] libvirt on x64
[sorry
[sorry for the delayed reply]
On 07/12/2010 08:48 AM, Tavares, John wrote:
> I just logged onto the first X64 based machine with libvirt (0.3.3-18.5)
> installed on it and I am only seeing the X64 based version of the shared
> library. Here is what I am seeing:
Which distro? Also, libvirt 0.3
I just logged onto the first X64 based machine with libvirt (0.3.3-18.5)
installed on it and I am only seeing the X64 based version of the shared
library. Here is what I am seeing:
$ rpm -qal libvirt | grep libvirt.so
/usr/lib64/libvirt.so.0
/usr/lib64/libvirt.so.0.3.3
Is there any reason why
