What a novel idea... trying that :)
- Original Message -
From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "JJ Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 7:36 AM
Subject: Re: [libvirt] network domain name patch
On Sat, Sep
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 12:22:01AM -0400, JJ Reynolds wrote:
> OK.. I can't figure it out.. mail is messing with line breaks and
> whatnot. Have a better method?
Can you not just attach it?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-top is 'top' f
OK.. I can't figure it out.. mail is messing with line breaks and whatnot.
Have a better method?
Thanks!
-JJ
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
Retry #2.
--- formatnetwork.html.in_orig 2008-09-12 23:21:18.0 -0400
+++ formatnetwork.html.in 2008-09-12 23:59:51.0 -0400
@@ -96,14 +96,26 @@
...
+
- Re: [libvirt] network domain name patch
t;
+ <ip address="192.168.122.1" netmask="255.255.255.0">
+ <dhcp>
+ <range start="192.168.122.10" end="192.168.122.254" />
+ <host mac="01:23:45:67:89:ab" ip="192.168.122.2"
name="myhost1.mydomain.net&q
As requsted, here is a patch for the network documentation. I don't know
how to generate the html file from the in file but the guts are here and it
seems right to me...
Thanks!
-JJ
--- formatnetwork.html.in_orig 2008-09-12 23:21:18.0 -0400
+++ formatnetwork.html.in 2008-09-12 23:59
s not already been done.
Sorry about missing the memory leak.
Thanks!
-JJ
- Original Message -
From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "JJ Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 4:20 AM
Subject: Re: [libvirt] networ
On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 03:14:45PM -0400, JJ Reynolds wrote:
> This is a followup to the excellent patch which allows static IP
> address assignment. The problem with that patch is that you can
> only set the host name and cannot set a FQDN because dnsmasq will,
> as a security measure, not allow
On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 03:14:45PM -0400, JJ Reynolds wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a followup to the excellent patch which allows static IP address
> assignment. The problem with that patch is that you can only set the host
> name and cannot set a FQDN because dnsmasq will, as a security measur
On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 03:14:45PM -0400, JJ Reynolds wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a followup to the excellent patch which allows static IP address
> assignment. The problem with that patch is that you can only set the host
> name and cannot set a FQDN because dnsmasq will, as a security measur
[ Hum, I don't know why it seems my first mail didn't make it to the
list, so reposting !]
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 06:37:16PM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 03:14:45PM -0400, JJ Reynolds wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a followup to the excellent patch which allows st
11 matches
Mail list logo
