On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 09:27:40AM +, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
>> > On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:33:07PM -0800, Josh Durgin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 09:27:40AM +, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:33:07PM -0800, Josh Durgin wrote:
> >> > Hi Daniel,
> >> >
> >> > On 11/08/2010 05:16 AM, Daniel P
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:33:07PM -0800, Josh Durgin wrote:
>> > Hi Daniel,
>> >
>> > On 11/08/2010 05:16 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> > In any case, before someone goes off and implement
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:33:07PM -0800, Josh Durgin wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > On 11/08/2010 05:16 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > In any case, before someone goes off and implements something, does this
> > look like the right genera
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:33:07PM -0800, Josh Durgin wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On 11/08/2010 05:16 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> In any case, before someone goes off and implements something, does this
> look like the right general approach to adding rbd support to libvirt?
> >>>
> >>>I t
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:04:50PM -0800, Josh Durgin wrote:
> On 11/17/2010 04:33 PM, Josh Durgin wrote:
> >Hi Daniel,
> >
> >On 11/08/2010 05:16 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >In any case, before someone goes off and implements something, does
> >this
> >look like the right general
On 11/17/2010 04:33 PM, Josh Durgin wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On 11/08/2010 05:16 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
In any case, before someone goes off and implements something, does
this
look like the right general approach to adding rbd support to libvirt?
I think this looks reasonable. I'd be incline
Hi Daniel,
On 11/08/2010 05:16 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
In any case, before someone goes off and implements something, does this
look like the right general approach to adding rbd support to libvirt?
I think this looks reasonable. I'd be inclined to get the storage pool
stuff working with
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 04:33:46PM -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > Something along the lines of
> > >
> > >
> > >virtimages
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > What do the 3 hostnames represent in
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > Ceph also has a 'pool' concept that contains some number of RBD images and
> > a command line tool to manipulate (create, destroy, resize, rename,
> > snapshot, etc.) those images, which seems to map nicely onto the storage
> > pool a
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 08:52:05PM -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've been working on RBD, a distributed block device backed by the Ceph
> distributed object store. (Ceph is a highly scalable, fault tolerant
> distributed storage and file system; see http://ceph.newdream.net.)
> Although
Hi,
We've been working on RBD, a distributed block device backed by the Ceph
distributed object store. (Ceph is a highly scalable, fault tolerant
distributed storage and file system; see http://ceph.newdream.net.)
Although the Ceph file system client has been in Linux since 2.6.34, the
RBD b
12 matches
Mail list logo
