On 10/09/2012 08:01 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/08/2012 03:54 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
>
>>
>> (3) (NEGATIVE-TEST) Try blockcommit to a base image which is a 'raw' device
>> - Question: I assume the below is expected, right? We cannot do
>> blockcommit into a
>> NON-qcow2 base file?
>
On 10/08/2012 10:12 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
>> Question:
>> At this point in time, I guess 'snapshot-revert' command is not uhelpful for
>> any practical
>> purposes while dealing with external snapshots,right?
>> - To rephrase, is there a way(in future?), to use 'blockcommit'(or
>> blo
On 10/08/2012 03:54 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
>
> (3) (NEGATIVE-TEST) Try blockcommit to a base image which is a 'raw' device
> - Question: I assume the below is expected, right? We cannot do
> blockcommit into a
> NON-qcow2 base file?
It should work. It may be that you have found a p
On 10/08/2012 03:24 PM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here are a few tests I've done over the weekend to test blockcommit w/ Eric's
> block commit
> patches:
> - https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-October/msg00091.html
> - https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list
Hi,
Here are a few tests I've done over the weekend to test blockcommit w/ Eric's
block commit
patches:
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-October/msg00091.html
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-October/msg00091.html
Most of these are from an earl
