On 25. 3. 2020 0:58, marcandre.lur...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Marc-André Lureau
>
> Unfortunately, advisory record locking lose the lock if any fd refering
> to the file is closed. There doesn't seem to be a way to preserve the
> lock atomically. We could eventually retake the lock if low pidfi
From: Marc-André Lureau
Unfortunately, advisory record locking lose the lock if any fd refering
to the file is closed. There doesn't seem to be a way to preserve the
lock atomically. We could eventually retake the lock if low pidfilefd
is required.
This fixes processes being leaked, as they are
