On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 12:29:29PM +0200, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 11:50 AM Ján Tomko wrote:
> >
> > On a Monday in 2020, marcandre.lur...@redhat.com wrote:
> > >From: Marc-André Lureau
> > >
> > >Since commit f10bd740e178c89f24d0b0298d0b5413537d0699 ("Cache the
>
Hi
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 11:50 AM Ján Tomko wrote:
>
> On a Monday in 2020, marcandre.lur...@redhat.com wrote:
> >From: Marc-André Lureau
> >
> >Since commit f10bd740e178c89f24d0b0298d0b5413537d0699 ("Cache the
> >presence of machine1 service"), the code checks for systemd1
> >registration. Not
On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 11:50:31AM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On a Monday in 2020, marcandre.lur...@redhat.com wrote:
> > From: Marc-André Lureau
> >
> > Since commit f10bd740e178c89f24d0b0298d0b5413537d0699 ("Cache the
> > presence of machine1 service"), the code checks for systemd1
> > registrat
On a Monday in 2020, marcandre.lur...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Marc-André Lureau
Since commit f10bd740e178c89f24d0b0298d0b5413537d0699 ("Cache the
presence of machine1 service"), the code checks for systemd1
registration. Not totally unreasonable, but that seems odd since we
actually check machi
From: Marc-André Lureau
Since commit f10bd740e178c89f24d0b0298d0b5413537d0699 ("Cache the
presence of machine1 service"), the code checks for systemd1
registration. Not totally unreasonable, but that seems odd since we
actually check machined presence in this function.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André
