Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M. wrote:
> Actually, adding case law is a good idea. I would recommend a conspicuous
> disclaimer as a header and footer on the page. I forget whether I pointed to
> the one at www.ecommercetax.com as an example.
I note that this disclaimer does *not* say the contents of t
>
> "Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > My main suggestion, however, was that some of the text - - the legal
> > stuff - - should be re-written so it is clear that an opinion
> of the author
> > is being expressed rather than a legal opinion being passed on by the
> > author
Brian Behlendorf writes:
> On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Russell Nelson wrote:
> > Any objection to my turning on this feature for license-discuss?
Nobody has complained, so I'm going to implement it.
> No, though I'm a bigger fan of the -mu options to ezmlm, i.e. you must be
> a subscriber to post, o
Sytze van Koningsveld writes:
> Hi,
>
> Does someone know how much time - on average - it takes for a new license to
> be approved by the OSI ?
It depends on how controversial it is. If it's something like the
X.Net license, where it's a relatively trivial change (specifying
jurisdiction on
"Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My main suggestion, however, was that some of the text - - the legal
> stuff - - should be re-written so it is clear that an opinion of the author
> is being expressed rather than a legal opinion being passed on by the
> author.
I agree that
5 matches
Mail list logo
