>
> These are good suggestions. They will be turned into reality with the
> greatest alacrity if you make them changes yourself and submit them to
> us.
Proposed "consumer-centric" index.html for www.opensource.org is
attached. Comments very much encouraged, on-list or in private.
Forrest
T
Karsten M. Self writes:
> - Ensure that sources are distributable.
Not only distributable, but also available.
Sigh. Last time I sat down to rewrite #2, I ended up concluding that
we really need to have *two* OSD's: one describing source code, and
another describing the distribution of a spe
Forrest J. Cavalier III writes:
> opensource.org has always been laid out as a website for
> producers. (I think it sort of invites you to write your own
> license, based on the ordering and wording of links.) But
> isn't the purpose of a mark to inform consumers, not producers?
>
> Perhap
David Johnson writes:
> Practicality leads to moral results, and morality leads to practical results.
> Open Source is free and Free Software is open. There is no need to divide
> this community up into factions.
Quite true. However, we don't want the actions of bearded radicals to
scare th
Thorsten Glaser writes:
> This breaks things which do not only consider code being licensed
> under $any_license but any kind of "work" (be it code, documentation,
> books etc.)
OSI certifies software, not documentation, as open source. There are
various documentation licenses out there. We'
Update:
Peter Thoeny is going to set up a new web for "my" experimental uses,
including this purpose. I don't know exactly when it will be set up,
and I've suggested the name Wikilearn (which is the name of the site
I've been working to set up).
If this link doesn't work
(http://twiki.org/cgi-b
6 matches
Mail list logo
