Thanks for your help with the license template, folks. Although my last few
revisions have not generated any discussion on the list itself, helpful
comments have continued to trickle in through private email. I have now
submitted my license template to the OSI for approval. In case you want
On 2002.07.25 11:46 Thatcher Ulrich wrote:
> What's wrong with the Perl Artistic License? If the situation you
> fear has not affected Perl (or has it...), why do you think it would
> affect Bento?
The Artistic License is considered by some to be flawed (see
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-l
* Michael St . Hippolyte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 2002.07.19 20:12 John Cowan wrote:
> >
> > There are, however, other ways to do it.
> >
> > 1) License the code under an ordinary Open Source license, whichever
> > one you like. License the trademark "Bento" only to people whose
> > implement
3 matches
Mail list logo