For cases 2 and 3: who is to say that I haven't, in the past, distributed the code to someone else and they happened to distribute a copy back to me? For that matter, did I really get it directly from you, or did I get it from someone else, who was redistributing it under the GPL?

If you're trying to un-GPL something that you have previously GPL'd, you're going to have a very hard time suing anyone who has a copy of the code from before you did that. Best you can do is stop distributing it, and hope that your software was unpopular enough that no one else will bother to redistribute it either.

- Bruce - IANAL -

From: John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jeremy Malcolm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: "C. Hamacher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problems in Open Source Licensing
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 00:26:45 -0500 (EST)

Jeremy Malcolm scripsit:

> [L]et's take
> the simpler case of releasing my own code under the GPL. Do you see
> anything that would prevent me from withdrawing those licensing terms?
> Short of contract or estoppel, and assuming that I adequately
> communicate the revocation of licence to my users, how can I be
> prevented from changing the licensing terms whenever and however I like?

I think there are three cases:

1) Users who have already relied on the GPL to distribute or modify your code

2) Users who are at present relying on the GPL to distribute etc.

3) Users who intend in the future to rely on the GPL to distribute etc.

As to case 1, I think you are pretty clearly estopped from doing anything
about their existing distributions or modifications; they relied on your
licensing terms in good faith. Case 3 users, OTOH, are screwed.
Case 2 is obviously intermediate.


(IANAL, TINLA)

> Licence conditions have to be reasonable, contract conditions don't.

Excellent. That means the infamous MSOSL, which I bruited about onthis
list a few years ago, can be freely dismissed. (This was a putative
Open Source license which required the licensee to consume moose
by-product as a condition of the license, for those of you who have
mercifully forgotten.)

--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To say that Bilbo's breath was taken away is no description at all. There
are no words left to express his staggerment, since Men changed the language
that they learned of elves in the days when all the world was wonderful.
--_The Hobbit_
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3

_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3

Reply via email to