On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Bruce Perens wrote:
> On 03/01/2012 09:09 PM, Chris Travers wrote:
>>
>> You seem to say "do not link" and thus repeat more or less what the FSF
>> says (and what Rosen spends a good time arguing against in his book, and he
>> is by no means alone--- at least in any
On 03/01/2012 09:09 PM, Chris Travers wrote:
You seem to say "do not link" and thus repeat more or less what the
FSF says (and what Rosen spends a good time arguing against in his
book, and he is by no means alone--- at least in any law review
articles I have been able to find and read the over
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Bruce Perens wrote:
> On 03/01/2012 08:32 PM, Chris Travers wrote:
>>
>> I am not at all sure that line works once you get into trying to bridge
>> GPL'd and proprietary apps
>
> Read
> http://www.datamation.com/osrc/article.php/3801396/Bruce-Perens-Combining-GPL-an
On 03/01/2012 08:32 PM, Chris Travers wrote:
I am not at all sure that line works once you get into trying to
bridge GPL'd and proprietary apps
Read
http://www.datamation.com/osrc/article.php/3801396/Bruce-Perens-Combining-GPL-and-Proprietary-Software.htm
Does it matter how I do this?
Very def
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Bruce Perens wrote:
> On 03/01/2012 08:02 PM, Chris Travers wrote:
>
>> How do I know if this license applies?
>
>
> Just assume it does, because you don't really have to decide this question
> to be safe.
I am not at all sure that line works once you get into tryi
Quoting John Cowan (co...@mercury.ccil.org):
> Which is as much to say, the wise person will use proprietary software
> to the full extent he can afford it, because there is no issue of
> copyright licensure, there is indemnity de facto or ex contractu from
> patent lawsuits, etc. etc.
This is a
Quoting Chris Travers (ch...@metatrontech.com):
> Rick;
>
> I think you are missing one key point in your reply to me.
I didn't miss that.
> In short: Part of the point is to realize that the engineer's question
> is "What do I have to do to stay safe? How do I know if this license
> applies?
On 03/01/2012 08:02 PM, Chris Travers wrote:
How do I know if this license applies?
Just assume it does, because you don't really have to decide this
question to be safe.
<>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
License-discus
Rick;
I think you are missing one key point in your reply to me. In short:
Part of the point is to realize that the engineer's question is "What
do I have to do to stay safe? How do I know if this license applies?"
Any answer you can give to the engineer's question will be both
heavily overincl
The fact that we have not resolved some questions doesn't mean that we
don't have /any/ bright lines. I have previously published guidelines
that would keep you far from any fuzzy issues, while allowing you to
build whatever you wish.
On 03/01/2012 07:42 PM, John Cowan wrote:
Which is as much
Rick Moen scripsit:
> Out in the real world, we have to deal with shades of grey and lack
> of perfect knowledge, which is why a wise person will not spend huge
> amounts of time pondering whether you can get away with particular
> types of deployments without having created an unauthorised deriva
Quoting Chris Travers (ch...@metatrontech.com):
> Derrida's theories on text and meaning are entirely applicable to
> legal agreements even if we pretend they aren't.
I note without special objection that you pretty much ignored my point and
moved the goalposts. No worries. I doubt you really e
12 matches
Mail list logo
