Re: [License-discuss] Is the old style MIT license a Free Software license

2012-03-13 Thread Richard Fontana
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 02:31:09PM -0500, Karl Fogel wrote: > Johnny Solbu writes: > >Hi. > >I tried maling FSFs licensing department, but the FSFs website says > >something to the effect that if they have answered the question on > >their webpage, the mail will be unanswered, and I have not recei

Re: [License-discuss] Is the old style MIT license a Free Software license

2012-03-13 Thread Bruce Perens
On 03/13/2012 12:31 PM, Karl Fogel wrote: I believe the "without fee" here refers to payment to the original licensor Yes. The statement is "permission [to exercise a number of rights] is hereby granted without fee." If it were "permission [to exercise a number of rights] without fee is hereby

Re: [License-discuss] Is the old style MIT license a Free Software license

2012-03-13 Thread Karl Fogel
Johnny Solbu writes: >Hi. >I tried maling FSFs licensing department, but the FSFs website says >something to the effect that if they have answered the question on >their webpage, the mail will be unanswered, and I have not received a >reply. So I'm asuming it is answered on their website. However

Re: [License-discuss] [#984402505] Is the old style MIT license a Free Software license

2012-03-13 Thread YouTube Editor
Thank you for contacting YouTube! This is just an automated message to let you know that we have received your email. Please note that general help inquiries won't be answered here. For help with other site-related issues, please visit our Help Center at http://www.google.com/support/youtube/. If

[License-discuss] Is the old style MIT license a Free Software license

2012-03-13 Thread Johnny Solbu
Hi. I tried maling FSFs licensing department, but the FSFs website says something to the effect that if they have answered the question on their webpage, the mail will be unanswered, and I have not received a reply. So I'm asuming it is answered on their website. However I cannot find the answer