Hello,
On 01/06/2013 04:23 AM, John Cowan wrote:
* *Direct contact*: it is always appropriate to email a list member,
mention that you think their behavior was out of line, and (if
necessary) point them to this document.
* *On-list*: discussing conduct on-list, either as part of another
message
> * *On-list*: discussing conduct on-list, either as part of another
message or as a standalone thread, is always acceptable.
Pretty often this sort of discussion has triggered an instant flame-fest.
And I have to agree with John. If there's a breach of civility, direct
confrontation is unlikely
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 7:23 PM, John Cowan wrote:
> Luis Villa scripsit:
>
>> * *Direct contact*: it is always appropriate to email a list member,
>> mention that you think their behavior was out of line, and (if
>> necessary) point them to this document.
>>
>> * *On-list*: discussing conduct on-l
Luis Villa scripsit:
> * *Direct contact*: it is always appropriate to email a list member,
> mention that you think their behavior was out of line, and (if
> necessary) point them to this document.
>
> * *On-list*: discussing conduct on-list, either as part of another
> message or as a standalon
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Kuno Woudt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 01/03/2013 05:04 AM, Luis Villa wrote:
>>
>>
>> If you have concerns about someone’s conduct, you can speak to them
>> directly, you can speak directly to the list moderators, or you can
>> discuss the conduct on the list.
>
>
> Fo
I've personally never seen open source forum software that wasn't an
abysmal nightmare from a usability perspective, whereas many people
here have email clients that they have chosen and customized
specifically to deal with their workflow. So I'm very reluctant to
make anyone less productive here b
6 matches
Mail list logo
