master/MIT-License.txt
[2] https://github.com/ghusse/jQRangeSlider/blob/master/GPL-License.txt
[3] https://opensource.stackexchange.com/a/4587/947
[4] https://opensource.stackexchange.com/a/4582/947
[5]
https://spdx.org/sites/cpstandard/files/pages/files/using_spdx_license_list_short_identifiers.pdf
[6] https://patchwork.kernel.or
hich represents
a significant[sic] number of terabytes.
This could become a lesser issue on the fetch side when softwareheritage.org
is fully operational. But still.
If anyone is interested by this, please contact me!
--
Cordially
Philippe Ombredanne
___
acode.com/licenses/
Every OSI licenses (and more) conditions have been carefully tagged as
seen here:
https://enterprise.dejacode.com/licenses/Demo/apache-2.0/#license-conditions
(disclosure: this is a product of my company)
--
Cordially
Philippe Ombredanne
__
> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 6:19 PM Philippe Ombredanne
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Luis Villa wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017, 11:07 AM Luis Villa wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hey, all-
>> >> I promised some board membe
licenses" list. Here
>> goes.
[...]
> Yet another (inevitably flawed) data set:
> https://libraries.io/licenses
With the merit that the all the underlying code is FLOSS.
Another possible source --always biased-- could be Debian's popcon and
so
ays and its mailing lists pages are 404.
- or if one feels strongly about the topic, public shaming?
[1] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-violation.en.html
[2] http://gpl-violations.org
--
Cordially
Philippe Ombredanne
___
License-discuss m
Since US government does not attract copyright
> I am unsure if they can attract copyright in other jurisdictions.
Maarten, are you suggesting then that the lack of copyright for a U.S. Federal
Government work would just then apply elsewhere too and that using an
alternative Apache license would not
still
address your needs?
--
Cordially
Philippe Ombredanne
+1 650 799 0949 | pombreda...@nexb.com
DejaCode : What's in your code?! at http://www.dejacode.com
nexB Inc. at http://www.nexb.com
___
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opens
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Andi McClure wrote:
> I am working on some projects (a programming language, a game library) for
> which I wish to use a "source attribution" license-- for example, the zlib
> license, or the 2-clause BSD license if I could somehow delete the second
> clause. I wan
ing. [1]
The harder or impossible part would have be to clean up the 1000+ of
packages using this faulty classifier
But there is really only three of these [2] and all of them look
either pretty old or abandoned and none has its packages effectively
hosted or distributed on Pypi.
[1]
gether!
>
> You can find the Open Source API at:
>
>https://api.opensource.org/
Very nice. Congrats and thanks!
--
Cordially
Philippe Ombredanne
___
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
f the choices? What if the terms conflicts? Must I pick
one license among them all? Must I or can I or not pass this choice
downstream? To be clear you would need to address all these (and
likely many other) related issues.... So this may not be such a good
idea after all.
--
Cordially
Philippe
e less likely anyone will want to contribute anything.
I would not touch code with such a weird waiver (even with a very long
pole).
And If you are lucky enough to ever receive contributions from others,
giving credit whether required or not is _always_ the right thi
ense text?
And if I use an existing OSI approved license as a base, would I need to
go through the full legal commentary to submit it for approval? (BTW, I
know this was debated in the past, but did not find any conclusion on
the topic.
--
Cheers
Philippe
philippe ombredanne | nexB - Open IT Asset Man
ense text?
And if I use an existing OSI approved license as a base, would I need to
go through the full legal commentary to submit it for approval? (BTW, I
know this was debated in the past, but did not find any conclusion on
the topic.
--
Cheers
Philippe
philippe ombredanne | nexB - Open IT Asset Man
15 matches
Mail list logo
