Re: [License-discuss] Free Public License/0 Clause BSD License with Zlib Warranty Disclaimer

2017-04-17 Thread Jonas Baggett
Hello Nate, I was actually having the same question as you and I don't know if you have found an answer yet. I just have found this page : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:MIT?rd=Licensing/MIT, where MIT licence variants are described. Some of them have a minimal no-waranty clause a

Re: [License-discuss] Free Public License/0 Clause BSD License with Zlib Warranty Disclaimer

2017-04-16 Thread Jonas Baggett
Hello Nate, I was actually having the same question as you and I don't know if you have found an answer yet. I just have found this page : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:MIT?rd=Licensing/MIT, where MIT licence variants are described. Some of them have a minimal no-waranty clause a

[License-discuss] Free Public License/0 Clause BSD License with Zlib Warranty Disclaimer

2016-09-24 Thread Nate Craun
Hello All, I was looking at the Free Public License/Zero Clause BSD License, and I saw that its warranty disclaimer is a lot longer/more capitalized than the zlib warranty disclaimer. The Free Public License says: THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGA