> COMMENT: This section has been added because of last year's
> Specht v. Netscape decision, which threw doubt on the validity of what =
> has
> become an accepted industry standard - of trying to make terms and
> conditions applicable (particularly in the web site context) without ma=
> king
> i
On Tuesday 23 April 2002 05:47 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On behalf of Sybase, Inc., I am submitting the attached Sybase Open Watom
> Public License v. 1.0 ("License") as part of OSI's software certification
> program.
Okay, I had a beer, and calmed down a bit.
First, I am not a member of t
> [ Please discuss this license. I have stored the PDF copy of the
> license at http://russnelson.com/SybaseOpenWatcomPublicLicense.v.1.0.pdf
> -russ ]
PDF is not acceptable for discussion. (There is a reason that
submissions must be in ASCII or HTML only.)
Since PDF is a derivative format,
On Tuesday 23 April 2002 05:47 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Section 2.1. A new subsection (c) has been added, as follows: "(c)
> Whenever reasonably feasible you should include the copy of this License in
> a click-wrap format, which requires affirmative acceptance by clicking on
> an "I acc
[ Please discuss this license. I have stored the PDF copy of the
license at http://russnelson.com/SybaseOpenWatcomPublicLicense.v.1.0.pdf
-russ ]
On behalf of Sybase, Inc., I am submitting the attached Sybase Open Wat=
com
Public License v. 1.0 ("License") as part of OSI's software certificati=
5 matches
Mail list logo
