On Mon, 03 Apr 2000, Andrew J Bromage wrote:
> I'd like to prevent this, but also, obviously, I'd prefer not to
> trample on fair use. I suspect that the answer lies in restricting
> "public performance". So let me ask the lawyers and non-lawyers:
I would be very leery of basing terms upon "pu
Andrew J Bromage writes:
> > The OSD has no particular comment on this, although many people have
> > felt that it is inappropriate to use a license to violate the privacy
> > of the users of some software package.
>
> There may be media-creation software "out there" whose licences require
> tha
G'day all.
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 05:53:20PM -0700, Seth David Schoen wrote:
> There have been some rumors that version 3 of the GNU GPL may require
> disclosure of source code in some cases of public performance.
I have also heard these rumours. I believe that this is intended to
deal with s
Andrew J Bromage writes:
> G'day all.
>
> I'm co-writing some software that is only really useful in a certain
> media industry which doesn't have a history of being very "open" with
> their source. If it is used within the industry, it will very likely
> be internally modified by media produce
G'day all.
I'm co-writing some software that is only really useful in a certain
media industry which doesn't have a history of being very "open" with
their source. If it is used within the industry, it will very likely
be internally modified by media producers and used to produce works,
and the
5 matches
Mail list logo
