Forrest J. Cavalier III scripsit:
> I am not a lawyer either, and I would not have known about
> MAI vs Peak unless it was brought up on this list.
BTW, one of Paula Samuelson's papers says that the DCMA
explicitly overturned MAI v. Peak.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
John Cowan wrote:
> Won't work (IANAL, TINLA), at least in the U.S.; any copies of
> computer programs that are needed in order to use the program
> are specifically non-infringing, by section 117. Normally,
> this refers to copying the binary form from disk to core,
> but it plainly would cover
Forrest J. Cavalier III scripsit:
> Here is the improved version 2. The trick is to distribute the
> shareware as source only. In that case, in order to run it,
> it must be compiled, and (unless you are compiling and linking
> in memory), that creates a derivative work, a right reserved
> to t
Karsten M. Self wrote:
> The attempt to key this to continued "use" rather than transfer has no
> standing under copyright as previously stated.
Based on the discussion so far, everything seems to depend on
whether the recipient has a license, or is an owner of a copy.
I was hoping the OSD wo
4 matches
Mail list logo
