Re: LS CALL FOR TOPICS - August 1999

[Keith A. Gillette]

I'd like to re-nominate this previously posted topic suggestion:

Leaving Quality undefined is a central tenet of the MOQ. We should work
towards clearly explaining why this is so and exploring the arguments both
for and against this position. Sarah: "Are you teaching Quality this
quarter?" "Yes..." - You know what it is. No you don't. Yes you do

Sorry, I don't have the original post to attribute it to its author.

Cheers,
Keith

__
Keith A. Gillette  




MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org

Re: LS CALL FOR TOPICS - August 1999

[B. Skutvik]

Hi Keith
My proposal is: 

Seen in the light of the MOQ, what is it that is described in the 
ZMM. Is it the emergence of SOM, the "coming of age" of the 
Intellectual level, or...?

I am leaving tomorrow (wednesday) and will be offline for two 
weeks, so I must vote too (sorry). The above will be my first choise, 
but if Denis Poisson is to forward his:

> if DNA is the "machine code" between the
> inorganic and the biological, what's the "machine code" between the
> biological and the social ? If we tackle this one fast enough, we could
> try the next one between social and intellect (mythos ? language ? how
> do they work ?).

disregard the first and give my vote to the second.

Bo


["Quality isn't IN the eye of the beholder. 
 Quality IS the eye of the beholder". 
 (Platt Holden)]


MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org