https://codereview.appspot.com/116540043/diff/40001/input/regression/lilypond-book/GNUmakefile
File input/regression/lilypond-book/GNUmakefile (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/116540043/diff/40001/input/regression/lilypond-book/GNUmakefile#newcode22
input/regression/lilypond-book/GNUmakef
Hello,
Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on
August 24th.
You can always view the most current countdown list here:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?q=Patch%3Apush%2Ccountdown%2Creview%2Cnew%2Cwaiting&colspec=Patch%20Owner%20ID%20Summary&sort=patch
On 2014/08/21 17:50:15, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Let's see if I understand the issue here.
Because the incipit is generated as a separate score hidden inside a
music
function it is not possible to use the usual override mechanism to
change any
values set inside the music function, including t
Let's see if I understand the issue here.
Because the incipit is generated as a separate score hidden inside a
music function it is not possible to use the usual override mechanism to
change any values set inside the music function, including the value of
InstrumentName.self-aligment-X. The defa
Mark Knoop writes:
> At 15:40 on 21 Aug 2014, Phil Holmes wrote:
>>Let's see if anyone else has an opinion.
>
> I am inclined to agree with David. The function should not have a
> different default alignment for the instrument name. It is a shame that
> the instrument name alignment can't be calc
At 15:40 on 21 Aug 2014, Phil Holmes wrote:
>Let's see if anyone else has an opinion.
I am inclined to agree with David. The function should not have a
different default alignment for the instrument name. It is a shame that
the instrument name alignment can't be calculated from any existing
layout
On 2014-08-21 17:03, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Phil, you wrote Thursday, August 21, 2014 3:18 PM
And this is the nub of the discussion. There's nothing actually _wrong_
with my patch: it's just you don't like how it looks. I very much do. This
time I've attached a centre-aligned and a right-a
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Kastrup"
> To: "Phil Holmes"
> Cc: ; ;
> ;
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 3:56 PM
> Subject: Re: Adds incipit section to NR (issue
> 108270043byphilehol...@googlemail.com)
>
>
> "Phil Holmes" writes:
>
>> > Let's see if a
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: ; ;
;
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 3:56 PM
Subject: Re: Adds incipit section to NR (issue
108270043byphilehol...@googlemail.com)
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> Let's see if anyone else has an opinion.
About what?
Phil, you wrote Thursday, August 21, 2014 3:18 PM
> And this is the nub of the discussion. There's nothing actually _wrong_
> with my patch: it's just you don't like how it looks. I very much do. This
> time I've attached a centre-aligned and a right-aligned example, and much
> prefer the l
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> Let's see if anyone else has an opinion.
About what? You want to argue about what instrument name alignment
looks nicest. But that's besides the point.
The issue I am talking about is that there is nothing inherent in
incipits that makes aligning instrument names diffe
Let's see if anyone else has an opinion.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
"Phil Holmes" writes:
>> Unless incipit-width is too small to accommodate the incipit in the
>> first place, the amount of space available for the instrument name is
>> \indent-\incipit-width. Even in that case, I don't see that the natural
>> or best placement of the instrument name in the rema
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: ; ;
;
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 2:43 PM
Subject: Re: Adds incipit section to NR (issue 108270043
byphilehol...@googlemail.com)
"Phil Holmes" writes:
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Kastrup"
> To: "Phil Holmes"
> Cc: ;
> ; ;
>
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 1:26 PM
> Subject: Re: Adds incipit section to NR (issue 108270043
> byphilehol...@googlemail.com)
>
>> At any rate: why do you believe that an in
- Original Message -
From:
To: ; ;
; ;
;
Cc: ;
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: Adds incipit section to NR (issue 108270043 by
philehol...@googlemail.com)
On 2014/06/29 13:51:33, PhilEHolmes wrote:
Please review.
Sorry to step in like that. I'm not able t
On 2014/08/21 12:55:37, Jean-Charles wrote:
On 2014/06/29 13:51:33, PhilEHolmes wrote:
> Please review.
Sorry to step in like that. I'm not able to comment on the code, but
have just
one question, since I don't use incipits: does it happen that the
original score
reproduced in an incipit
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: ; ;
;
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: Adds incipit section to NR (issue 108270043
byphilehol...@googlemail.com)
At any rate: why do you believe that an instrument should be formatted
differently
On 2014/06/29 13:51:33, PhilEHolmes wrote:
Please review.
Sorry to step in like that. I'm not able to comment on the code, but
have just one question, since I don't use incipits: does it happen that
the original score reproduced in an incipit happens to be on a four
lines staff? How would it t
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> - Original Message -
> From:
> To: ; ;
>
>> On 2014/08/21 10:21:18, mail_philholmes.net wrote:
>>
>>> There's nothing wrong in changing a poor default to a good one, and
>>> then allowing the user to restore the poor one.
>>
>> But you are not "changing a poor de
- Original Message -
From:
To: ; ;
; ;
Cc: ;
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: Adds incipit section to NR (issue 108270043 by
philehol...@googlemail.com)
On 2014/08/21 10:21:18, mail_philholmes.net wrote:
There's nothing wrong in changing a poor default to a
On 2014/08/21 10:21:18, mail_philholmes.net wrote:
There's nothing wrong in changing a poor default to a good one, and
then
allowing the user to restore the poor one.
But you are not "changing a poor default to a good one". You are
overriding locally, as the default of a single command, wha
Sorry - the images were not helpful. It looks like my mailer adds the image
when it's sent, not when it's attached. Here they are again.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lil
- Original Message -
From:
To: ; ;
; ;
Cc: ;
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 9:40 PM
Subject: Re: Adds incipit section to NR (issue 108270043 by
philehol...@googlemail.com)
On 2014/08/20 08:17:01, email_philholmes.net wrote:
>> ly/property-init.ly:303: ragged-last = ##f
>> woul
24 matches
Mail list logo
