Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/6] sched: pack small tasks

2012-12-16 Thread Alex Shi
> > CPU is a bug that slipped into domain degeneration. You should have > SIBLING/MC/NUMA (chasing that down is on todo). Uh, the SD_PREFER_SIBLING on cpu domain is recovered by myself for a share memory benchmark regression. But consider all the situations, I think the flag is better to be r

Re: [Linaro-validation] Patch for YAML test definitions

2012-12-16 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Fathi Boudra writes: > Hi, > > On 13 December 2012 11:48, Senthil Kumaran wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I converted lava-test test definitions to work on lava-test-shell with the >> new YAML format. These converted tests are mostly from >> https://code.launchpad.net/~linaro-foundations >> >> I request som

Re: [PATCH 2/2][V2] cpuidle - optimize the select function for the 'menu' governor

2012-12-16 Thread Francesco Lavra
Hi Daniel, On 12/14/2012 02:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > As the power is backward sorted in the states array and we are looking for > the state consuming the little power as possible, instead of looking from > the beginning of the array, we look from the end. That should save us some > iteration

Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: Manage only online cpus

2012-12-16 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 16 December 2012 18:34, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sunday, December 16, 2012 11:20:08 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: >> cpufreq core doesn't manage offline cpus and if driver->init() has returned >> mask including offline cpus, it may result in unwanted behavior by cpufreq >> core >> or governors.

Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: Manage only online cpus

2012-12-16 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, December 16, 2012 11:20:08 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > cpufreq core doesn't manage offline cpus and if driver->init() has returned > mask including offline cpus, it may result in unwanted behavior by cpufreq > core > or governors. > > We need to get only online cpus in this mask. There ar