Hmm, there seems to be a very very long list of "btrfs: found 1 extents"
messages and nothing else in between them.
Why would deleting large files help? I don't want to delete files on my server
unless I have no other option.
—
Mark Rada
mar...@uwaterloo.ca
On 2010-03-18, at 11:19 PM, Yan, Zh
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Mark Rada wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> I've been using btrfs on my file server since 2.6.32 and after upgrading to
> .33 I noticed that rebalancing took way longer than before.
>
> I have a 5 disk array used for a btrfs md setup, different hard drive sizes,
> brands, an
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> A user reported a bug a few weeks back where if he set max_extent=1m and then
> did a dd and then stopped it, we would panic. This is because I miscalculated
> how many extents would be needed for splits/merges. Turns out I didn't
> actuall
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 08:59:48AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 08:53:13PM +0800, Chris Mason wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:42:57AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > > Btrfs uses below equation to calculate ra_pages:
> > > fs_info->bdi.ra_pages = max(fs_info->bdi.ra_pages
Hi devs,
I've been using btrfs on my file server since 2.6.32 and after upgrading to .33
I noticed that rebalancing took way longer than before.
I have a 5 disk array used for a btrfs md setup, different hard drive sizes,
brands, and interfaces.
The last time I rebalanced I was using about 800
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 08:53:13PM +0800, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:42:57AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > Btrfs uses below equation to calculate ra_pages:
> > fs_info->bdi.ra_pages = max(fs_info->bdi.ra_pages,
> > 4 * 1024 * 1024 / PAGE_CACHE_SIZ
Hello, would somebody please write down how to create deb kernel package
with latest btrfs from the git tree -- that would be a big help.
thanks,
rk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 07:17:12PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> Hi Chris
>
> On Monday 15 March 2010, Chris Mason wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 07:30:01PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> > > On Friday 12 March 2010, Pat Patterson wrote:
> > > > Are there any plans to implement some
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 05:01:50PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 03:18:07PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > The master branch of the btrfs unstable tree has a collection of fixes
> > and features:
> >
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason
A user reported a bug a few weeks back where if he set max_extent=1m and then
did a dd and then stopped it, we would panic. This is because I miscalculated
how many extents would be needed for splits/merges. Turns out I didn't actually
take max_extent into account properly, since we only ever add
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:42:57AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> Btrfs uses below equation to calculate ra_pages:
> fs_info->bdi.ra_pages = max(fs_info->bdi.ra_pages,
> 4 * 1024 * 1024 / PAGE_CACHE_SIZE);
> is the max() a typo of min()? This makes the readahead size
11 matches
Mail list logo