Ric Wheeler wrote:
On 06/18/2010 06:04 PM, Edward Shishkin wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 09:29:40PM +0200, Edward Shishkin wrote:
Jamie Lokier wrote:
Edward Shishkin wrote:
If you decide to base your file system on some algorithms then
please
use the original ones from p
On 06/18/2010 06:04 PM, Edward Shishkin wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 09:29:40PM +0200, Edward Shishkin wrote:
Jamie Lokier wrote:
Edward Shishkin wrote:
If you decide to base your file system on some algorithms then please
use the original ones from proper academic papers
Chris Mason wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 09:29:40PM +0200, Edward Shishkin wrote:
Jamie Lokier wrote:
Edward Shishkin wrote:
If you decide to base your file system on some algorithms then please
use the original ones from proper academic papers. DO NOT modify the
algorithms in
Hi,
current btrfs-progs-unstable fails to compile for me (Ark Linux devel
branch, using gcc 4.5 and eglibc 2.12):
/usr/bin/ld: btrfsck.o: in function maybe_free_inode_rec:btrfsck.c:323:
error: undefined reference to 'S_ISDIR'
/usr/bin/ld: btrfsck.o: in function maybe_free_inode_rec:btrfsck.c:340:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 12:47 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 8:06 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 7:22 PM, David Brown wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 06:06:23PM -0500, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>>>
> # btrfs subvolume create new_root
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 09:29:40PM +0200, Edward Shishkin wrote:
> Jamie Lokier wrote:
> >Edward Shishkin wrote:
> >>If you decide to base your file system on some algorithms then please
> >>use the original ones from proper academic papers. DO NOT modify the
> >>algorithms in solitude: this is ver
Jamie Lokier wrote:
Edward Shishkin wrote:
If you decide to base your file system on some algorithms then please
use the original ones from proper academic papers. DO NOT modify the
algorithms in solitude: this is very fragile thing! All such
modifications must be reviewed by specialists in t
Jamie Lokier wrote:
Edward Shishkin wrote:
If you decide to base your file system on some algorithms then please
use the original ones from proper academic papers. DO NOT modify the
algorithms in solitude: this is very fragile thing! All such
modifications must be reviewed by specialists in
Daniel J Blueman wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Edward Shishkin
wrote:
Mat wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Edward Shishkin wrote:
Hello everyone.
I was asked to review/evaluate Btrfs for using in enterprise
systems and the below are my first impressions (l
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 06:22:39PM +0200, Edward Shishkin wrote:
> Chris Mason wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 05:05:46PM +0200, Edward Shishkin wrote:
> >>Chris Mason wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 03:32:16PM +0200, Edward Shishkin wrote:
> Mat wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:58
Daniel J Blueman wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Edward Shishkin
wrote:
Mat wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Edward Shishkin wrote:
Hello everyone.
I was asked to review/evaluate Btrfs for using in enterprise
systems and the below are my first impressions (linux
Chris Mason wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 05:05:46PM +0200, Edward Shishkin wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 03:32:16PM +0200, Edward Shishkin wrote:
Mat wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Edward Shishkin wrote:
Hello everyone.
I was
Edward Shishkin wrote:
> If you decide to base your file system on some algorithms then please
> use the original ones from proper academic papers. DO NOT modify the
> algorithms in solitude: this is very fragile thing! All such
> modifications must be reviewed by specialists in the theory of
> alg
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 05:21:21PM +0200, Christian Stroetmann wrote:
> Chris Mason wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 03:32:16PM +0200, Edward Shishkin wrote:
> >>Mat wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Edward Shishkin wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> I was asked to review/evaluat
Chris Mason wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 03:32:16PM +0200, Edward Shishkin wrote:
Mat wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Edward Shishkin wrote:
Hello everyone.
I was asked to review/evaluate Btrfs for using in enterprise
systems and the below are my first impressions
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 05:05:46PM +0200, Edward Shishkin wrote:
> Chris Mason wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 03:32:16PM +0200, Edward Shishkin wrote:
> >>Mat wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Edward Shishkin wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> I was asked to review/evaluate Btr
Chris Mason wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 03:32:16PM +0200, Edward Shishkin wrote:
Mat wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Edward Shishkin wrote:
Hello everyone.
I was asked to review/evaluate Btrfs for using in enterprise
systems and the below are my first impressions (li
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 03:32:16PM +0200, Edward Shishkin wrote:
> Mat wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Edward Shishkin wrote:
> >>Hello everyone.
> >>
> >>I was asked to review/evaluate Btrfs for using in enterprise
> >>systems and the below are my first impressions (linux-2.6.33).
> >>
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Edward Shishkin
wrote:
> Mat wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Edward Shishkin wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello everyone.
>>>
>>> I was asked to review/evaluate Btrfs for using in enterprise
>>> systems and the below are my first impressions (linux-2.6.33).
>>>
>>>
Mat wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Edward Shishkin wrote:
Hello everyone.
I was asked to review/evaluate Btrfs for using in enterprise
systems and the below are my first impressions (linux-2.6.33).
The first test I have made was filling an empty 659M (/dev/sdb2)
btrfs partition (mo
Aloha Mat:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Edward Shishkin wrote:
Hello everyone.
I was asked to review/evaluate Btrfs for using in enterprise
systems and the below are my first impressions (linux-2.6.33).
The first test I have made was filling an empty 659M (/dev/sdb2)
btrfs partition (m
21 matches
Mail list logo
