Any comments for these patches?
Thanks
Miao
On wed, 05 Jan 2011 18:07:11 +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
> I have a bunch of random fixes of the space management in
>
> git://repo.or.cz/linux-btrfs-devel.git space-manage
>
> They are the ENOSPC fixes, as well as fixes for df command.
> The first one and
Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> Tree as of commit 7bc4a4ce68f8c6d064ea949446852e996526f692 dies during btrfs
> build on x86-64:
>
> CC [M] fs/btrfs/ctree.o
> In file included from fs/btrfs/ctree.c:21:0:
> fs/btrfs/ctree.h:1003:17: error: field ‘super_kobj’ has incomplete type
> fs/btrfs/ctree.h:1074:1
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 05:13:53PM +0800, Wu, Fengguang wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:27:33AM +0800, Li, Shaohua wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 11:07 +0800, Wu, Fengguang wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:03:16AM +0800, Li, Shaohua wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 09:38 +0800, Wu,
Hello all,
I've been struggling to understand when to use 'btrfs_end_transaction()'
instead of 'btrfs_commit_transaction()', and vice-versa.
My doubts arise due to use of both of them in different points of the code, and
some times a given method may even chose to do one instead of the other ba
On 12 January 2011 00:58, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
> 2011/1/12 Tsutomu Itoh :
>> (2011/01/12 9:25), Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>> I have a weird error with my RAID 0 btrfs partition.
>>> Information for the partitions follow:
>>>
>>> # btrfs filesystem show
>>> failed to read
2011/1/12 Tsutomu Itoh :
> (2011/01/12 9:25), Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I have a weird error with my RAID 0 btrfs partition.
>> Information for the partitions follow:
>>
>> # btrfs filesystem show
>> failed to read /dev/sr0
>> Label: none uuid: 1882b025-58e4-4287-98a3-9b772af0a
(2011/01/12 9:25), Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have a weird error with my RAID 0 btrfs partition.
> Information for the partitions follow:
>
> # btrfs filesystem show
> failed to read /dev/sr0
> Label: none uuid: 1882b025-58e4-4287-98a3-9b772af0ad76
> Total devices 2 FS by
Hey all,
I have a weird error with my RAID 0 btrfs partition.
Information for the partitions follow:
# btrfs filesystem show
failed to read /dev/sr0
Label: none uuid: 1882b025-58e4-4287-98a3-9b772af0ad76
Total devices 2 FS bytes used 108.16GB
devid2 size 74.53GB used 55.26GB
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 09:22:49AM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Hugo Mills wrote:
> > There is a root subvolume namespace (subvolid=0), which may contain
> > files, directories, and other subvolumes. This root subvolume is what
> > you see when you mount a ne
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 11:32:20PM +, Alan Chandler wrote:
> On 09/01/11 22:01, Hugo Mills wrote:
> >> I find the wiki
> >>also confusing because it talks about subvolumes having to be at the
> >>first level of the filesystem, but again further up this thread
> >>there is an example which is u
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 04:13:42PM -0500, Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
> > IOWs, all they want to do is avoid the unwritten extent conversion
> > overhead. Time has shown that a bad security/performance tradeoff
> > decision was made 13 years ago in XFS, so I see little reason to
> > repeat it for ex
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 04:41:47PM -0500, Ted Ts'o wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 03:42:42PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> > Implementation is up to the filesystem. However, XFS does (b)
>> > because:
>> >
>> > 1) it was extremely simple
On 01/11/11 15:40, Hubert Kario wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 11, 2011 15:33:38 Ivan Labáth wrote:
>> On 01/11/11 15:19, Hubert Kario wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, January 11, 2011 14:54:38 Ivan Labáth wrote:
On 01/10/11 14:36, Hubert Kario wrote:
> On Monday 10 of January 2011 14:25:32 Carl Cook
On Tuesday, January 11, 2011 15:33:38 Ivan Labáth wrote:
> On 01/11/11 15:19, Hubert Kario wrote:
> > On Tuesday, January 11, 2011 14:54:38 Ivan Labáth wrote:
> >> On 01/10/11 14:36, Hubert Kario wrote:
> >>> On Monday 10 of January 2011 14:25:32 Carl Cook wrote:
> Here is my proposed cron:
>
On 01/11/11 15:19, Hubert Kario wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 11, 2011 14:54:38 Ivan Labáth wrote:
>> On 01/10/11 14:36, Hubert Kario wrote:
>>> On Monday 10 of January 2011 14:25:32 Carl Cook wrote:
Here is my proposed cron:
btrfs subvolume snapshot hex:///home /media/backups/snapsho
On Tuesday, January 11, 2011 14:54:38 Ivan Labáth wrote:
> On 01/10/11 14:36, Hubert Kario wrote:
> > On Monday 10 of January 2011 14:25:32 Carl Cook wrote:
> >> Here is my proposed cron:
> >>
> >> btrfs subvolume snapshot hex:///home /media/backups/snapshots/hex-{DATE}
> >>
> >> rsync --archive
On 01/10/11 14:36, Hubert Kario wrote:
> On Monday 10 of January 2011 14:25:32 Carl Cook wrote:
>> Here is my proposed cron:
>>
>> btrfs subvolume snapshot hex:///home /media/backups/snapshots/hex-{DATE}
>>
>> rsync --archive --hard-links --delete-during --delete-excluded --inplace
>> --numeric-ids
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:27:33AM +0800, Li, Shaohua wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 11:07 +0800, Wu, Fengguang wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:03:16AM +0800, Li, Shaohua wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 09:38 +0800, Wu, Fengguang wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 08:15:19AM +0800, Li,
18 matches
Mail list logo
