On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Björn Wüst wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, I do not have a disk to test it right now. The disk I am
> planning to use is with the post service still :) .
you can use sparse files. Possibly with losetup, if necessary.
> Thank you for your replies to this email (bjoern.
Good morning,
I currently have a single-disk setup where I want to use btrfs filesystem. Yet,
I expect to add additional disks to this system in the future. Those disks
shall be visible to the OS like a single disk, i.e. using multi-disk feature in
btrfs. While data shall be striped among thos
Hi,
the ceph cluster is running under heavy load for the last 13 hours
without a problem, dmesg is empty and the performance is good.
-martin
Am 23.05.2012 21:12, schrieb Martin Mailand:
this patch is running for 3 hours without a Bug and without the Warning.
I will let it run overnight and r
Two files in the different subvolumes may have the same inode id, so
The rb-tree which is used to manage the defragment object must take it
into account. This patch fix this problem.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie
---
fs/btrfs/file.c | 45 +++--
1 files changed
On 05/23/2012 01:21 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 05/17/2012 02:08 PM, Liu Bo wrote:
>> This patch fixes two bugs:
>>
>> When we do not assigne a device id for the resizer,
>> - it will only take one device to resize, which is supposed to apply on
>> all available devices.
>> - it
If cow_file_range_inline fails with ENOSPC we abort the transaction which
isn't very nice. This really shouldn't be happening anyways but there's no
sense in making it a horrible error when we can easily just go allocate
normal data space for this stuff. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik
---
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 16:44 +0100, Martin wrote:
> On 23/05/12 05:19, Calvin Walton wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 22:47 +0100, Martin wrote:
> >> I've got two recent examples of SSDs. Their pristine state from the
> >> manufacturer shows:
> >
> >> Device Model: OCZ-VERTEX3
> >> 00
Hi Josef,
this patch is running for 3 hours without a Bug and without the Warning.
I will let it run overnight and report tomorrow.
It looks very good ;-)
-martin
Am 23.05.2012 17:02, schrieb Josef Bacik:
Ok give this a shot, it should do it. Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send th
Hi Rogerio,
On 05/23/2012 05:00 PM, Rogerio Bastos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying mount many subvolume during boot via fstab:
>
> UUID=xxx /usr btrfs subvol=usr,ro,nodev 0 0
> UUID=xxx /home btrfs subvol=home,nodev,nosuid 0 0
> UUID=xxx /var btrfs subvol=var,nodev 0 0
> UUID=xxx /var/tmp btrfs subv
Quoting Hugo Mills :
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:00:02PM -0300, Rogerio Bastos wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying mount many subvolume during boot via fstab:
UUID=xxx /usr btrfs subvol=usr,ro,nodev 0 0
UUID=xxx /home btrfs subvol=home,nodev,nosuid 0 0
UUID=xxx /var btrfs subvol=var,nodev 0 0
UUID=xxx /var/
During unmount, it could happen that the integrity checker printed a
warning message "attempt to free ... on umount which is not yet iodone"
which turned out to be a false positive.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens
---
fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion
On 23/05/12 05:19, Calvin Walton wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 22:47 +0100, Martin wrote:
>> I've got two recent examples of SSDs. Their pristine state from the
>> manufacturer shows:
>
>> Device Model: OCZ-VERTEX3
>> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>
>> Device Mode
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:00:02PM -0300, Rogerio Bastos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying mount many subvolume during boot via fstab:
>
> UUID=xxx /usr btrfs subvol=usr,ro,nodev 0 0
> UUID=xxx /home btrfs subvol=home,nodev,nosuid 0 0
> UUID=xxx /var btrfs subvol=var,nodev 0 0
> UUID=xxx /var/tmp btrfs
Hi,
I'm trying mount many subvolume during boot via fstab:
UUID=xxx /usr btrfs subvol=usr,ro,nodev 0 0
UUID=xxx /home btrfs subvol=home,nodev,nosuid 0 0
UUID=xxx /var btrfs subvol=var,nodev 0 0
UUID=xxx /var/tmp btrfs subvol=var-tmp,nodev,noexec,nosuid 0 0
But only the first one is mounted. When
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 02:34:43PM +0200, Christian Brunner wrote:
> 2012/5/22 Josef Bacik :
> >>
> >
> > Yeah you would also need to change orphan_meta_reserved. I fixed this by
> > just
> > taking the BTRFS_I(inode)->lock when messing with these since we don't want
> > to
> > take up all that
On Wed, 23 May 2012 09:29:12 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> On 05/22/2012 06:53 PM, Stefan Behrens wrote:
>
>> The device statistics are written into the device tree with each
>> transaction commit. Only modified statistics are written.
>> When a filesystem is mounted, the device statistics for each invol
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:53:48PM +0200, Stefan Behrens wrote:
> An ioctl interface is added to get the device statistic counters.
> A second ioctl is added to atomically get and reset these counters.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens
> ---
> fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 26
> fs
I'm sure restoring all those fields would be functionality that most
server admins would want. If anyone on this list can add it, then you
have my thanks.
On 5/23/2012 3:07 AM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 03:42:05PM -0600, Henry Bakker wrote:
>> Any possibility of getting btrfs-r
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 02:34:43PM +0200, Christian Brunner wrote:
> 2012/5/22 Josef Bacik :
> >>
> >
> > Yeah you would also need to change orphan_meta_reserved. I fixed this by
> > just
> > taking the BTRFS_I(inode)->lock when messing with these since we don't want
> > to
> > take up all that
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:53:47PM +0200, Stefan Behrens wrote:
>*/
> clear_buffer_uptodate(bh);
> + btrfs_device_stat_inc(&device->cnt_write_io_errs);
> + device->device_stats_dirty = 1;
> + btrfs_device_stat_print_on_error(device);
2012/5/22 Josef Bacik :
>>
>
> Yeah you would also need to change orphan_meta_reserved. I fixed this by just
> taking the BTRFS_I(inode)->lock when messing with these since we don't want to
> take up all that space in the inode just for a marker. I ran this patch for 3
> hours with no issues, let
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 03:42:05PM -0600, Henry Bakker wrote:
> Any possibility of getting btrfs-restore to also restore the files
> timestamp?
Quick look, yes it is possible and quite straightforward. The function
restore.c:copy_file has direct access to the found on-disk inode item
and can acces
Hi!
We are using external SAS storage via LSI MegaRAID SAS 9280-8e
controller. When storage suddenly goes offline (cable unplug or
expander glitch) the kernel (Fedora 3.3.5-2 64bit) outputs to log lots
of
kernel: [63.509223] sd 4:2:2:0: rejecting I/O to offline device
but later crashes wi
23 matches
Mail list logo
